Real interesting reading in the
Times in their "Ninth Annual Year in Ideas". More stuff along the lines of our culture and how we consciously and subconsciously react to technologies. Of particular interest are some insights gleamed from this that directly effect some of our client's products and the work we do for them. I will say no more on that though except to ask, when is it time to say that something is "good enough"?
Anyway, I guess consumers seem to outwardly strive for the latest and greatest. In the end though, it is convenience, affordability, and continuous availability that matters. Great example from the article - "High-definition televisions have turned every living room into a home cinema, yet millions of us choose to watch small, blurry videos on our computers and our mobile devices." Huh. I guess that is true.
Photo by jovike - http://www.flickr.com/photos/jvk/4923343/Another fascinating item is based on some research at Stanford done comparing lo-fi to hi-fi versions of rock songs. It seems when you ask younger listeners which one they prefer, the lo-fi version seems to win out. So much for that perfect sound quality MP3 player everyone is carrying around in their pocket. I guess some things just weren't meant to be "perfect". Or, maybe it already was?